Tender Scam: Jharkhand HC rejects Bail Plea of Ex-Minister in PMLA Case [Read Order]

Jharkhand HC Denies Bail to Ex-Minister in Alleged Tender Scam PMLA Case

The Jharkhand High Court has rejected the bail plea of a former state minister accused in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case linked to an alleged tender scam. The court order underscores the stringent requirements for bail under the PMLA, particularly concerning the likelihood of the accused committing further offenses.

Details of the Case

The case revolves around allegations of irregularities and corruption in the allocation of government tenders during the minister’s tenure. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) is investigating the matter, alleging that the accused used their position to amass illegal wealth through these illicit deals. The ED claims that significant sums of money were laundered through various channels.

Court’s Reasoning for Bail Rejection

The High Court bench, while denying bail, emphasized the “twin conditions” stipulated under Section 45 of the PMLA. These conditions necessitate the court to be convinced that:

  • The accused is not guilty of the alleged offense.
  • The accused is unlikely to commit any further offense while on bail.

The court stated that these conditions were not met in the former minister’s case, citing the seriousness of the allegations and the potential for the accused to tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.

Implications of the Order

This order sends a strong message regarding the judiciary’s stance on corruption and money laundering cases. It highlights the rigorous legal standards required for granting bail in cases involving economic offenses, particularly those investigated under the stringent provisions of the PMLA. The rejection reinforces the resolve to combat corruption at all levels.

Summary:

  • Jharkhand HC rejects bail for ex-Minister in tender scam related PMLA case.
  • Court cites failure to meet “twin conditions” of Section 45 of PMLA.
  • Order underscores strict approach to bail in economic offense cases.
Key Takeaways:

  • The PMLA’s Section 45 imposes significant hurdles for accused individuals seeking bail.
  • The judiciary is taking a firm stance against corruption and money laundering.
  • The case highlights the ongoing efforts to investigate and prosecute alleged tender irregularities in Jharkhand.
  • The ED continues to pursue individuals suspected of financial crimes and money laundering activities.